[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Peter Makholm <sslug@sslug> writes: > Kort fortalt: På kataloger tillader x-bitten at foretage operationer > på *indholdet* af kataloget, herunder open(2) og stat(2). Hvis bare et > af katalogerne i pathen mangler x-bitten er operationen ikke tilladt. Jeg skal gerne tilstå at betydningen af x-bitten på kataloger er noget der er lidt svært at forstå, men det er ikke mere kompliceret end ovenstående. Man skal dog lige også indse at '.' og '..' er reelt indhold af kataloger og ikke bare pseudonavne for det aktuelle katalog og overkataloget. //Makholm
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |