[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

RE: [SIGNATUR] ComputerWorld: Alvorlig sikkerhedsbrist ved TDC-signatur



Er løsningen så ikke at vælge LGPL?

Da vi valgte LGPL til OpenSign var det netop for at sikre

1. at koden efterfølgende IKKE kunne lukkes
2. at løsningen kunne spille sammen med andre (evt. lukkede) dele fra 3.-parter.

Mit gæt er at OpenOCES projektet foretrækker færrest mulige forskellige licenser. Dette er dog ikke diskuteret i koordinationsgruppen.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Egon Andersen [mailto:sslug@sslug 
Sent: 18. maj 2004 14:54
To: sslug@sslug
Subject: Re: [SIGNATUR] ComputerWorld: Alvorlig sikkerhedsbrist ved TDC-signatur


Kim Pedersen wrote:
>>Jens Bo Friis wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Egon,
>>>
>>>eller bare LGPL lissom opensign. ellers kan det vel ikke anvendes 
>>>kommercielt?
>>>
>>
>>GPL forhindrer ikke at det kan anvendes kommercielt!
>>FSF sælger da produkter!
>>(Men GPL har 'gøge-unge effekt' der medfører at alt det kommer i 
>>berøring med skal være GPL!) Eller citat af Earnie Boyd:
>>"The GPL is a license virus that has verbiage to the fact that your
>>proprietary software becomes open source and must be placed under the
>>license of the GPL."
>>
> 
> Er dette da et problem? Som FSF nævner i deres license-list
> (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html):
> 
> "The Common Public License is incompatible with the GPL because it has 
> various specific requirements that are not in the GPL.
> 
>     For example, it requires certain patent licenses be given that the 
> GPL does not require. (We don't think those patent license 
> requirements are inherently a bad idea, but nonetheless they are 
> incompatible with the GNU GPL.)"
> 
> 
> // Kim Pedersen
>   -- Freedom Matters!

Jeg er ikke advokat, men jeg har lidt svært ved at se CPL skulle være i 
modstrid med GPL. Hmmmm...
Problemet med GPL er at den også er *inkompatibel* med MPL, så jeg ved 
ikke hvor godt det er sammen med en plug-in til Mozilla!!!

/Egon


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:34 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *