[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jim Oksvold skrev:
> Safari er notert med 2.2% og burde regnes med under Firefox synes > Jim.
I betragtning af at Safari bruger konqueror-kode og ikke mozilla-kode, kan jeg ikke forstå logikken i den holdning.
God fornøjelse,
Jacob
Jeg ble nok lurt av utseendet. Jeg mente å huske at den brukte Gecko, men det er feil.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safari_%28web_browser%29
Du har helt rett håper jeg.
Jeg husker noe for lenge siden om å porte Gecko til Konqueror, men det ble visst bare historie.
Jeg får trøste meg med Netscape og Iceweasel :-)
Mvh Jim Oksvold
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |