[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > Jon Bendtsen <sslug@sslug> writes: > > > Hvorfor, det er RMS's licens, han har opfundet den og fået den > > Hvis man ikke kan argumenterer for hvilken betydning licensen har > alene ved at se på licensen, så er der et problem! det er jo også det de gør, og når de så stadig ikke kan blive enige, så spørger de RMS hvad hans intention var. De kunne også have valgt at gå rettens vej, så er det bare en dommer der skal fortolke licensen, i stedet for RMS. ion++ -- A picture always lies...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |