Re: [ITPOLITIK] Høringen i går

[Keld Jørn Simonsen <sslug@sslug>]

On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:12:37PM +0200, donald_j_axel wrote:
> 
> Stig Johansen citat:
> 
> ===============================================================================
> 
>  The Buyer defines an Open Standard as:
>  * Everyone has access to the specifications at no costs.

Dette er ikke krævet for åbne standarder, men nok for "gratis
standarder"

>  * There are no license fees implied for the use of the standard.

Dette er heller ikke krævet for den almindelige definition af åbne
standarder.

>  * The standards are approved (or in the process of being approved) through a
>    recognised body such as W3C, OASIS or ISO.

Kan desværre ikke bruges, W3C er ikke en åben
standardiseringsorganisation.

>  * At least three well-known software suppliers must have products meeting
>    these standards.

Dette er heller ikke krævet for at man kan sige at tandarden er åben.

>  * Industry de facto standards where the Supplier and the Buyer mutually
>    agree on including the standards.

Slet ikke krævet for åbne standarder.

> ===============================================================================
> 
> Godt! Virkelig godt.

Elendigt, en der ikke véd noget om åbne standarder.
Ikke et eneste punkt er der hold i.

Hilsen
keld