[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

SCO dømt for FUD [Was: Re:Ny PM om SCO's FUD og swpat ?)



On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 09:29:52 +0200, Peter Makholm <sslug@sslug>
wrote:

>Erik Lange <sslug@sslug> writes:
>
>> "Andre har besluttet sig for at slå igen. De tæller den tyske
>> Linux-lobbyistgruppe Linuxtag, der har erklæret, at den vil rejse
>> søgsmål mod SCO Group, hvis der ikke foreligger bevis for den stjålne
>> kode senest i dag."
>
>'... hvis der ikke foreligger bevis ...'
>
>Ikke et ord i dit citat om at Novells udmelding har nogen som helst
>relevans og det er den jeg forholder mig til her.

Det er jo et spørgsmål om sund kildekritik.

Ja - jeg betragter Novells udmeldinger som kommende fra en seriøs og
troværdig kilde - hvorfor er du så kritisk overfor deres udtalelser ?

Hvad bygger din skepsis overfor Novell på ?

Hvordan ser du på domstolene, som kilder ?

"Det er uvederhæftig at SCO fremturer med trusler mod Linuxbrugere, så
længe selskabet ikke har bevidst, at væsentlige dele af Linux-koden
rent faktisk krænker SCO's ophavsret. Det har landsretten i Bremen
netop fastslået, og derfor udstedt et forbud mod SCO's kampagne.

[...]

I dommen fra Bremens landsret fremgår det, at SCO ikke for nuværende
har grundlag for - overfor slutbrugere - at påstå, at brugen af Linux
er ulovlig og at brugerne kan gøres ansvarlige overfor SCO’s påståede
ophavsret."

Kilde: http://www.comon.dk/index.php?page=news:show,id=14192

Hilsen,
Erik L



 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:21 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *