[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stallman repeterer ofte at "Intellectual Property" er et dårligt begreb. Jag har et forslag at aendre lidt på språget så at IP isted skal udlaeses "Immaterial property". Måske kan vi så skabe et bedre fokus på Industrial Property, altså patenter. F eks "Den industrielle tidsalder sammen med des ejendom er på vej at fases ud, Nu lever vi i informationstildaldern. Vi ser frem emod et adekvat retstillstand for vores nye tiden". (tja... slogans er slemme, altid) Hvad syns I? Hele sagen mellom SCO og IBM påminner lidt om dinusaurier i dödskamp. //Erik
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |