[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > E. Sjørlund skrev: > >> Mit forslag er, [...] og at der oprettes to regulære, selvstændige >> lister til hhv Sandkassen og Frederiksberggruppen. > > Det lyder som en god idé. Skal de så hedde »sslug.lokalt.roskilde« og > »sslug.lokalt.frederiksberg«? > Det ville jo i så fald blive de eneste tre-lags lister. sslug.sandkassen, sslug.frederiksberg, sslug.naestved (eller hvad de vil kalde sig, hvis de kommer i gang) ville for mig være helt fint.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |