[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Keld J|rn Simonsen skrev: > Problemet med dette er bl.a. at XHTML er en W3C-anbefaling, og som > sådan ikke en åben standard, men en lukket industristandard. > Det er ret umuligt at være med til at påvirke den reelt. > > Den mest opdaterede åbne standard på dette område er ISO HTML, > ISO 15445, som svarer til 4.0 strict. Hvorfor skulle ISO's standarder være mere åbne? Man må jo ikke engang distribuere dem. -- Niels Elgaard Larsen sslug@sslug
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |