[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:46:16PM +0000, Jesper Krogh wrote: > I sslug.forening, skrev Keld J|rn Simonsen: > > Problemet med dette er bl.a. at XHTML er en W3C-anbefaling, og som > > sådan ikke en åben standard, men en lukket industristandard. > > Det er ret umuligt at være med til at påvirke den reelt. > > Keld.. kan du ikke uddybe. Jeg har altid troet at XHTML (med masser af > CSS) var html's efterfølger i W3C henseende? Ja, det mener jeg også. Vi kigger også på om vi kan lave XHTML til en åben standard. Keld
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |