[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sandt nok. Men et ikke-gratis SSLUG vil også holde mange fra at prøve kræfter med GNU/Linux.
Det tror jeg ikke.
Måske, men bliver vi så ikke bare en mini-DKUUG?
jo, og det er der vel ingen grund til?
Nu er jeg godt nok modstander af SSLUG som DK-LUG, men du kan evt. finde inspiration i mit paralelle liv:
Det er jeg også, det er derfor jeg vil have at SSLUG skal gøre noget for at ryste DK-LUG af sig. Det er dog kun de tekniske lister der gør SSLUG til DK-LUG. Og det kunne ordnes ved at lægge listerne ud et sted vi har fælles med alle de andre LUG'er i danmark.
-- Rune
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |