[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Poul-Erik Andreasen wrote: > Så længe en sådan beslutning ikke er imødegået er det > officielt SSLUG-politik at være i mod software patenter. Jeg forventer at SSLUG vil VÆRE imod software patenter også i fremtiden, fordi patenter udgør en risiko for udbredelsen af Open Source programmer. Jeg forventer blot ikke at SSLUG vil GØRE noget imod software patenter. Efter et "show me the code princip" så står jeg ved hvad jeg skrev i mit sidste indlæg. -- Mvh. Carsten Svaneborg http://www.softwarepatenter.dk hvor fremtidens idemonopoler bekæmpes idag.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |