Re: [FORENING] SSLUG får også ris fra PROSA - med ret te

[Erik Lange <sslug@sslug>]

At 08:37 PM 8/19/02, Peter Toft wrote:
> Jeg tror vi har brug for nogen med grafisk
> erfaring snarere end folk med teknisk HTML-snilde.
> Hvem har den slags erfaring?

Det er min erfaring at både teknik og grafisk kan ødelægge ethvart godt 
websted, hvis ikke det bliver brugt rigtigt.

Det man oftest har brug for, er administration af ens indhold.

Dels hvordan man får indhold ind i ens system og dels hvordan det 
præsenteres... heraf et de seneste års mest brugte buzz-words:

CMS - Content Management Systems...

Fandt lige en skæg gammel artikel, der indeholder en 
"how-sucky-is-your-site"-test - skift "medarbejdere" ud med "medlemmer", 
CEO med formand, og så passer det ret godt på enhver forening :

Here's how to rate if your intranet sucks:
1) Can everyone publish on your intranet? Really? Rate your system sucky if 
fewer than 80% of your employees regularly publish on your intranet (ie: at 
least once a week). If fewer are publishing, ask yourself why. I'll bet 
it's cause you're running on Apache or IIS (er, traditional Web servers or 
using FrontPage), which makes it too hard to put up pages for most people.

2) How many people are between the janitor and your intranet? Rate your 
system sucky if ANYONE needs to be involved for your janitor, or your CEO 
to publish on your intranet.

3) Does your intranet system require hard-to-learn (or expensive) client 
software like Macromedia's Dreamweaver or Microsoft's FrontPage? Rate your 
system sucky if any client software needs to be loaded for your employees 
to publish on your intranet.

4) Does your intranet require anyone who publishes to have an FTP 
application? Rate your system sucky if you require your users to get 
involved with arcane TCP/IP infrastructure models.

5) Does your intranet have interactive features like discussion boards? 
Rate your system sucky if your site is published only using static pages 
running on an Apache or IIS server.

6) Did your intranet software take your IT team more than one hour to 
setup? Rate your system sucky if it did. Your intranet should be easy to 
setup for your IT department. You want to spend your IT resources on 
improving your products and your customer-focused web sites.

7) Can your employees easily open a new URL for new projects or new 
divisions? Rate your intranet sucky if they need to get an IT guy involved 
to do that.

8) Does your intranet software cost more than $1000 for your entire 
company? Rate your intranet sucky if it does. (If you score this area 
sucky, it multiplies any other "sucky" answers on this quiz).

9) Does your intranet software work through firewalls and NAT's? Without 
getting your IT department involved? Rate your intranet sucky if it 
doesn't. All intranet software should work through port 80 with very few 
exceptions.

10) Does your intranet software publish to Palm devices without doing much, 
if any, extra work? Rate your intranet sucky if it takes more than an hour 
to set it up to publish all info to a Palm device.

11) When your CEO says "change the entire look and feel" of our intranet, 
how long does it take? Rate your intranet sucky if it takes more than 20 
minutes for your entire site (after building a template). Do you need to 
change each page by hand?

Hele artiklen findes på:
http://scobleizer.manilasites.com/2001/09/27

- det er jo ikke et spørgsmål om at finde en ny og fiksere font at skrive 
forsiden med, men om at organisere det indhold der nu engang er på 
forsiden, løbende og dynamisk... og det har som sagt grundlæggende meget 
lidt med både teknik og grafik at gøre -  IMHO - det er helt andre baner 
man skal tænke i, hvis en evt. re-organisering skal holde over tid...

Hilsen,
Erik