[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Henrik Brix Andersen skrev: > > Og hvor vil du så have Haskell? (Haskell kan både fortolkes og > > kompileres). > > Samme problem opstår med LISP. > > Jeg synes ikke om ideen med at skelne mellem fortolkede og kompilerede > sprog. Personligt mener jeg at C/C++ bør have sin egen liste, og alt > andet (prog) på en anden liste. Det er i og for sig også fint med mig. Jeg ønsker bare at folk kan bevare overblikket over, hvilke lister SSLUG udbyder! -prog-bin/fortolket var bare et forslag til, hvordan vi kan skære lidt i listetallet. Mvh. -- Rune
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |